In the 80's, Palladium brought us a system with multiple universes (known as the multiverse), but they weren't actually connected. Then, in 1990, there was Rifts. This single game helped to bridge all the universes in the Palladium system under one big cosmological convergence. Seasoned role players know Rifts well and there are many different viewpoints on it being a good thing or not. I for one am thankful for the invention of Rifts so that we could bring together concepts from different games together.
For instance... in the 90's, my group of friends and I were avid players of the Palladium system and began to utilize Rifts as a way to bring together our favorite aspects from other games. We brought together elements from Robotech, Beyond the Supernatural, Heroes Unlimited, Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles, Rifts and Ninjas and Superspies into a single world under the banner of being heroes, researchers and inventors. This was our sandbox, and it was fun.
One of the biggest inventions that came from this sandbox was called the "Omega". It was a mashup between standard mecha and the Invid Royal Command Battloid. This was meant so that even "normal" humans could utilize it. I happen to have an artist rendering by the player who developed the actual idea behind it.
The great part of the World of Darkness is that you can play each game separately, or combine them together for the rich feel that Mark Rein·Hagen and the other developers had in mind. As much as they can be played separately, I feel that they are better combined. This is something that has been lost on the powers-that-be who develop the live action rules for the Mind's Eye Society, who seem to prefer to keep each game separate.
Sure, Dungeons & Dragons has their different settings such as Dragonlance, Forgotten Realms, Dark Sun, Ravenloft and so on. I never felt that inter-setting travel was not something that TSR and WotC had in mind... even though they do have inter-planar travel. I know there have been some DM's (myself included) that allowed for the inter-setting travel. This just helps to promote the rule of all RPG's that the no matter what the rules in the books state, the DM/GM/ST has final determination in their games.
Pallidium...Sigh..great ideas..great writing...terrible system.ReplyDelete
White Wolf on the other hand...was wierd..it was systems that were meant to be put together theoretically..but werent designed with a balanced approach.
It wasnt untill they got to the New World of Darkness that they actually started thinking about balancing powerlevels..but after dozen or so books that sort of got tossed out the window too.
AD&D I agree with much of your evaluation. The majority of the worlds were not meant to go together (Dark Sun, and DragonLance Especially, also Birthright).
There were a handful that were built with shared realms in mind...the Continent that is forgotten realms also includes the Land of Al'Qadim and an Asian Expansion that I can never quite recall, and ties very easily in with Ravelonft.
For Genre bending with simple mechanics we cant forget the beast that is GURPS though.
Or if you want to go more rules light...BESM can do alot..as can many of the newer variants of the Fudge system.
Thank you for the comment, Leshrac. I used to enjoy Palladium in my youth, but haven't had a chance to give it another try in a long time.ReplyDelete
I've never had the occasion to try BESM of the Fudge system. One of these days I guess. GURPS is something else that I've never actually played. I know that Steve Jackson took concepts from several genres and games and brought them together under the GURPS banner. I'd be willing to give it a try if given half a chance.
I haven't played the earlier editions of GURPS, but 4th edition is very solid. I've done medieval low fantasy, hard sci-fi, Firefly, a bunch of weird one-shots in various versions of Infinite Worlds...all sorts of wacky stuff. It's probably my favorite system and anytime I run into a game where I really like the world but dislike its ruleset, my immediate reaction is just to redo it in GURPS.ReplyDelete